Hawking, Colbert, Ryan, Sterling, MIT, Piketty.
FAA, FCC, and ATF must regulate drones. It is not so much what capital can do without labor or machines can do with intellegence, but...
What business, government and people do separately.
*
[update of sorts.]
[[ Owe what a web ... ]]
That's the ticket. The Ribble. The Iron Knee, or I Ron Knee of labelism and to reads or not two Reids. Have knot will travel. Knot 2 4 M that which I may not read so you may have to.
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Knee. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Knee. Sort by date Show all posts
Wednesday, May 07, 2014
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Iron Knee?
Or I Ron Knee?
My first instinct was based on, this can't be right, could it? I guess it can. But the Immelt to Jobs is like a Nixon to China ploy. Unfortunately, that foreign policy reference may have backfired a bit, military friction has become economic friction. But a better word would be competition. Or would it?
But really, I am conflating two fields into one, or is it a third? The Tax Code. While it is not all about who's at fault, tax cuts or spending, or economic or foreign policy, having the biggest con(I mean beneficiary of tax policy and foreign policy) pushing for an overhaul, we just may eliminate many loopholes and level the playing field a bit. And as for contrast, Obama to Libya is NOT the Bush to Iraq or Cheesehead to Wisconsin moment.
[On another line: Democrats can hold the line and compromise, as long as there is a line that some Republicans will greet.
My first instinct was based on, this can't be right, could it? I guess it can. But the Immelt to Jobs is like a Nixon to China ploy. Unfortunately, that foreign policy reference may have backfired a bit, military friction has become economic friction. But a better word would be competition. Or would it?
But really, I am conflating two fields into one, or is it a third? The Tax Code. While it is not all about who's at fault, tax cuts or spending, or economic or foreign policy, having the biggest con(I mean beneficiary of tax policy and foreign policy) pushing for an overhaul, we just may eliminate many loopholes and level the playing field a bit. And as for contrast, Obama to Libya is NOT the Bush to Iraq or Cheesehead to Wisconsin moment.
[On another line: Democrats can hold the line and compromise, as long as there is a line that some Republicans will greet.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Leaking Intelligence
Why are Republicans Forcing a Shutdown of Government? This is the ledership to a preemptive thought bubble blown earlier. i.e. I thought that the Republicans are going to force a shut down because they have already blamed one on the Democrats just as the Democrats are about to present their compromise. Now this is not to predict a shutdown, but it is easy for the Republicans to predict one. And indeed it may only be in the Democrats power to force one. Just look at Wisconsin. Woops, even their out of state filibuster did not stop the Republicans. Now, cutting the jest and my tangent. Back to the thought bubble. The Republicans may force a shutdown to blame the Democrats, or the Democrats may force a shutdown to hold their horses. It seems that false equivalents, make it either the Trojan Horse or the Four Horseman. But back to my thought bubble, I just said that.
{Further leaking of nuance and exceptionalism, the so-called Constitutionalists, orginal intenders, and frackin' flip-floppin' neo-cons or Libertarians forget all about the Bush administration and the congressional behaviour then. As I have sketchily outlined the constitution and the war powers act and the partiot act, the president is within his powers until the law or the spirit changes it. How much Iron Knee or I Ron Knee is there that the UN Libya resolution is Numbered 1973? Or that the Patriot act was just extended?
BTW: Freedom is not a license, in reaction to or spin-off of Bill Maher, in respect to the requirement of humor for him and not Beck or O'Reilly, and I might add or Trump a few others.
Hint: on labels and scroll-over tangent I have not always read nor will I read (or reread)all links that are embedded in my blog. But I do wish to note them as sometimes serving as footnotes which I sometimes google post post, which sometimes may just be scrolled over or glannced at after clicking on to get the gist of.
[Toxic Leak? I am concerned with the roles that government spouses play. Not to mention Media Matters and its battle with FOX related to its non-profit status. But let me burst my thought bubble. The Republicans may not hold together on the ability to shut it down, but it will likely be another extention. I don't think either side wants to shut it down, but look who's talking.]
[Speaking of breaking or thought: here is the why, which will be inserted later, but it is for now to get the Democrats to move, and blame them for failure when the Republicans can move the line away a better economy. Stuck bubble: Should Corporate Executive go to jail for killing people? No, since corporations are people the whole corporations should. Just being facitious but really, they should be paying the same taxe rates as people, and have passports.]
{Further leaking of nuance and exceptionalism, the so-called Constitutionalists, orginal intenders, and frackin' flip-floppin' neo-cons or Libertarians forget all about the Bush administration and the congressional behaviour then. As I have sketchily outlined the constitution and the war powers act and the partiot act, the president is within his powers until the law or the spirit changes it. How much Iron Knee or I Ron Knee is there that the UN Libya resolution is Numbered 1973? Or that the Patriot act was just extended?
BTW: Freedom is not a license, in reaction to or spin-off of Bill Maher, in respect to the requirement of humor for him and not Beck or O'Reilly, and I might add or Trump a few others.
Hint: on labels and scroll-over tangent I have not always read nor will I read (or reread)all links that are embedded in my blog. But I do wish to note them as sometimes serving as footnotes which I sometimes google post post, which sometimes may just be scrolled over or glannced at after clicking on to get the gist of.
[Toxic Leak? I am concerned with the roles that government spouses play. Not to mention Media Matters and its battle with FOX related to its non-profit status. But let me burst my thought bubble. The Republicans may not hold together on the ability to shut it down, but it will likely be another extention. I don't think either side wants to shut it down, but look who's talking.]
[Speaking of breaking or thought: here is the why, which will be inserted later, but it is for now to get the Democrats to move, and blame them for failure when the Republicans can move the line away a better economy. Stuck bubble: Should Corporate Executive go to jail for killing people? No, since corporations are people the whole corporations should. Just being facitious but really, they should be paying the same taxe rates as people, and have passports.]
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Not to Follow-Up...
...Or Down*
But that's the ticket.
While I did read the 2nd link, I have only glanced at the Sorkin critique and I am surprised at the criticism for the creator of Newsroom. Not an HBO subscriber, I only saw the first episode OnDemand and was very impressed with the whole deal. I don't know if I will have the same perspective of Alex Pereene if I could have seen the later episodes. Not that I was that impressed or critical of him to begin with. I thought he was fair and balanced, but not in the way it has come to be taken. This actually this does follow from my not going that far and how some get** where they are.
My second line will be more fully digested later, and provide more fair and balanced context.
* actually it might follow(the only piece I have fully digested)
** BaneOr Side Show
*** anachronistic irony (I Ron Knee, Iron Knee of Bowles-Simpson/Balanced Solution)
[The Romney Tax problem is a sideshow so that they can say that Obama won't talk about the economy. Republicans have been unprecedented obstuctionists so they can run against*** the economy, rather than the choice between more change and turning around to go back to what took us down. Now that is a follow up.]
But that's the ticket.
While I did read the 2nd link, I have only glanced at the Sorkin critique and I am surprised at the criticism for the creator of Newsroom. Not an HBO subscriber, I only saw the first episode OnDemand and was very impressed with the whole deal. I don't know if I will have the same perspective of Alex Pereene if I could have seen the later episodes. Not that I was that impressed or critical of him to begin with. I thought he was fair and balanced, but not in the way it has come to be taken. This actually this does follow from my not going that far and how some get** where they are.
My second line will be more fully digested later, and provide more fair and balanced context.
* actually it might follow(the only piece I have fully digested)
** BaneOr Side Show
*** anachronistic irony (I Ron Knee, Iron Knee of Bowles-Simpson/Balanced Solution)
[The Romney Tax problem is a sideshow so that they can say that Obama won't talk about the economy. Republicans have been unprecedented obstuctionists so they can run against*** the economy, rather than the choice between more change and turning around to go back to what took us down. Now that is a follow up.]
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Ryan/Romney run from Ryan plan..
Ryan runs from own plan endorsed by Romney.
Not Exactly.
The lies and hypocrisy know no pail.
Here is to Thomas Roberts. (Not... Today)*
*Links scrolling up.
(i.e. reverse order)
Rachel Maddow: Shrug Life **
Morning Joe: Romney "hate"/"chains" Biden
Today: Reince Priebus "blood"
Today: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Ryan Obama Pick?
Thomas Roberts under "Here". Who is Paul Ryan?
--
The Ed Show: unchained memory
**[?]
The Ed Show: Romney Medicare Lies
The Last Word: SNL Republican War Hypocrisy Ryan***
Lean Forward? Or go back. Ryan Fiscal Conservative?
TheLiaisonReport: Wikileaks Ryan
Lean Forward(or back [FOX] to Morning Joe) Cuts and Run.
The Last Word: Romney and Ryan run from Romney Plan
** Maddow Seg-way
***[Smoking Gun: Ryan votes against stimulus, says it works and takes funds for state.]
[The E Pit o'me of Nuance or Flip-Flop.(in reference to above layout, links and asterisks.]
[And this AM: Ryan runs from Wonk and Partisanship. That is a hoot, since he was on the BS Panel(Bowles-Simpson). Reminds me of Saving Pirate Ryan, and "going postal". The USPS(congressional failure) is the Iron Knee to Romney/Ryan I Ron Knee, Funding Bane Or...
(Note: Bane/Bain Boehner confluance and bracket of "Funding"(...)"Or" or Mitt Rob Me. The USPS is not going broke, anymore than the government is going broke, Republicans are breaking it by running their plan which ironically in moderation would solve so many problems. i.e. investment. But they are over-investing in the pension plan and at the same time hoping to privatise it. Won't that be a boon?) In proper context, pirates were a government program. Speaking of hole in the Hart.(AM)]
[See bold book ends: Shrug Life /The Last Word. Not exactly.]
[A last clip (Jon Stewart on The Cycle!) And the pie chart of fiscal irresponsibility does not even include the flip-flop of going austere and focusing on cutting the debt while cutting taxes as soon as the Republicans no longer led.]
Not Exactly.
The lies and hypocrisy know no pail.
Here is to Thomas Roberts. (Not... Today)*
*Links scrolling up.
(i.e. reverse order)
Rachel Maddow: Shrug Life **
Morning Joe: Romney "hate"/"chains" Biden
Today: Reince Priebus "blood"
Today: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Ryan Obama Pick?
Thomas Roberts under "Here". Who is Paul Ryan?
--
The Ed Show: unchained memory
**[?]
The Ed Show: Romney Medicare Lies
The Last Word: SNL Republican War Hypocrisy Ryan***
Lean Forward? Or go back. Ryan Fiscal Conservative?
TheLiaisonReport: Wikileaks Ryan
Lean Forward(or back [FOX] to Morning Joe) Cuts and Run.
The Last Word: Romney and Ryan run from Romney Plan
** Maddow Seg-way
***[Smoking Gun: Ryan votes against stimulus, says it works and takes funds for state.]
[The E Pit o'me of Nuance or Flip-Flop.(in reference to above layout, links and asterisks.]
[And this AM: Ryan runs from Wonk and Partisanship. That is a hoot, since he was on the BS Panel(Bowles-Simpson). Reminds me of Saving Pirate Ryan, and "going postal". The USPS(congressional failure) is the Iron Knee to Romney/Ryan I Ron Knee, Funding Bane Or...
(Note: Bane/Bain Boehner confluance and bracket of "Funding"(...)"Or" or Mitt Rob Me. The USPS is not going broke, anymore than the government is going broke, Republicans are breaking it by running their plan which ironically in moderation would solve so many problems. i.e. investment. But they are over-investing in the pension plan and at the same time hoping to privatise it. Won't that be a boon?) In proper context, pirates were a government program. Speaking of hole in the Hart.(AM)]
[See bold book ends: Shrug Life /The Last Word. Not exactly.]
[A last clip (Jon Stewart on The Cycle!) And the pie chart of fiscal irresponsibility does not even include the flip-flop of going austere and focusing on cutting the debt while cutting taxes as soon as the Republicans no longer led.]
Tuesday, November 06, 2012
Hump Day for Journalism
Well*... it is usually a Wednesday** but let's be preemptive !
*not a deep subject
** said relief ?

(** [!] d ? ! )

{HD}/ Iron Knee [?]?[!]
[Update: Footnotes]
11-22-12 [C-VC]
*not a deep subject
** said relief ?

(** [!] d ? ! )
{HD}/ Iron Knee [?]?[!]
[Update: Footnotes]
11-22-12 [C-VC]
Labels:
cartoons,
Charts,
Contrary Brin,
Images,
Journalism,
OpEdNews
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Laughter is the Best Medicine?
This is not just a google of the day. It is about a search for meaning. It is not about two sides* agreeing so they must be right or the answer being in the middle of two extremes, but it is about what works maybe not being even on that line or plane. I take as a model, the constitution and its three branches, the legislative, the executive and the judicial, but what of they be, in the of, by and for? Well that would be from another speech but there is the preamble, not to mention the declaration. The point is that if two perspectives agree it does not make their agreement correct, there may be another perspective that gets them off the dime of the teeter totter. Not to mention if three agree it will get us anywhere, let alone progress or good. The recent UN action on Libya is a prime example of progress, not on the agreement that it receives in popular opinion, but that it is a change in the process. It is not a final solution, but it is an international community effort of which, we have only just begun to talk.
*on disagreement with involvment in Libya
[I take the stand that the President is within the spirit of the law until the law is respelled.]
[But myth** of the day? And based on two links back, this site is not necessarily a myth buster but maybe some reactions will.]
** links that follow are not exactly copacetic or flowing naturally, but I will point to the foundations of myth in this faux debunker. His arguments are too based on the myths that may be the subject of this piece. "Myth(one): Social Security didn’t create the deficit and shouldn’t be cut to fix it". Half true, and the other half not the only solution. Anything further may be besides the point. From Myth Two: "As long as voters consider(...), they will be." Well, duh. Fill in the blank. This guy is, in my mind,(using his own words)"... Exhibit A in why it is so hard to fix them." In some ways he misses his own myth or actual truth: "In other words, the myth misses the point. Whether Social Security continues to pay benefits at today’s rates isn’t a question of credit quality. It’s a question of politics and priorities." And his most destructive myth: "Which brings us to what may be the most destructive myth of all: The idea that Social Security is, fiscally speaking, an end in itself." And the height of I Ron Knee: "The discussion we need to have, then, isn’t simply whether we can pull the levers to bring Social Security into balance. That is easy." This might be Exibit B of mything with myths.
*on disagreement with involvment in Libya
[I take the stand that the President is within the spirit of the law until the law is respelled.]
[But myth** of the day? And based on two links back, this site is not necessarily a myth buster but maybe some reactions will.]
** links that follow are not exactly copacetic or flowing naturally, but I will point to the foundations of myth in this faux debunker. His arguments are too based on the myths that may be the subject of this piece. "Myth(one): Social Security didn’t create the deficit and shouldn’t be cut to fix it". Half true, and the other half not the only solution. Anything further may be besides the point. From Myth Two: "As long as voters consider(...), they will be." Well, duh. Fill in the blank. This guy is, in my mind,(using his own words)"... Exhibit A in why it is so hard to fix them." In some ways he misses his own myth or actual truth: "In other words, the myth misses the point. Whether Social Security continues to pay benefits at today’s rates isn’t a question of credit quality. It’s a question of politics and priorities." And his most destructive myth: "Which brings us to what may be the most destructive myth of all: The idea that Social Security is, fiscally speaking, an end in itself." And the height of I Ron Knee: "The discussion we need to have, then, isn’t simply whether we can pull the levers to bring Social Security into balance. That is easy." This might be Exibit B of mything with myths.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Iron Knee of Inflation
Officials Warn Not to Inflate North Korean Threat
Verses "dangerously na•ve"*
*irony of diplomatic calculus
Note to FP!: Ctrl F first link "not read"
Verses "dangerously na•ve"*
*irony of diplomatic calculus
Note to FP!: Ctrl F first link "not read"
Friday, February 01, 2013
FOOTNOTE PAGE THREE
2-12-13 : see image and flow (4F?)
2-13-13 : Plank (b.s.) A. The History of B.S., B. Health Care Summit (sc), C.Enough? (sc), D. , E. I'm not saying..., F. , G. Co-Wink-E-Dink?, H. A Shot in the Arm?, I. In the begining..., J. A PEAS meant... (sc), K.Two Points (sc), L. Legislation not politics!, M. Walking the Plank[!] (sc)
{L}:* review of (sc)=[Scroll Click]. The hyperlinked headings that are sorted from the (b.s.)=[blog search] are sometimes not to the post they head. Hence one can scroll and see that they are not the link under (sc). But the (sc) will contain the link of the heading.[ or as evolved 4-4-13 below*]
2-14-13 (F P too?) A. B. (sc) C. (sc)
2-28-13 (Breaking Bread?)
(b.s.) Irony+chef = Rocket Man?[!] , I Ron Knee Chef
(b.s.) Buffet+food= The Big Cheese (sc)
*4-4-13 (link inserted) (sc) evolved ABC's will be used to carry the link that is for some reason of the (b.s.)'s algorithms not in the heading.)
2-13-13 : Plank (b.s.) A. The History of B.S., B. Health Care Summit (sc), C.Enough? (sc), D. , E. I'm not saying..., F. , G. Co-Wink-E-Dink?, H. A Shot in the Arm?, I. In the begining..., J. A PEAS meant... (sc), K.Two Points (sc), L. Legislation not politics!, M. Walking the Plank[!] (sc)
{L}:* review of (sc)=[Scroll Click]. The hyperlinked headings that are sorted from the (b.s.)=[blog search] are sometimes not to the post they head. Hence one can scroll and see that they are not the link under (sc). But the (sc) will contain the link of the heading.[ or as evolved 4-4-13 below*]
2-14-13 (F P too?) A. B. (sc) C. (sc)
2-28-13 (Breaking Bread?)
(b.s.) Irony+chef = Rocket Man?[!] , I Ron Knee Chef
(b.s.) Buffet+food= The Big Cheese (sc)
*4-4-13 (link inserted) (sc) evolved ABC's will be used to carry the link that is for some reason of the (b.s.)'s algorithms not in the heading.)
Friday, July 14, 1995
Saturday, February 18, 1995
George Clue Knee
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Miranda Warning!
Stand your legislation. *
Pun on knot or Tan Gent shall ?
* [See ***] (snow den) Greenwald/Miranda** FISA ?
** a, b, c
[Not to pun on keeping quite, but hear, here to facing charges, and progress on transparency in a sea of non-Cents.]
[*** links 1 & 2 inserted post asterisks & are yet to reads]
[Yet knot! ... Everything is(a) not open to transparency, not to mention not too Aeschylus.]
( ( 9 9 9 ) ) [links minus 4]
8-21-13 Saved in Draft: House/NOW/Harman - Knee. Knot ... ? Who nows[!]
Wednesday, August 01, 2012
Literary Hero Passes
Gore Vidal: Not that I have heroes,
he was the hero of some friends
and I guess nemesis of the opposition.
Segue*: MSNBC Wrong Knee
PoliticsNation Healthcare for Women
MorningJoe- Poll land for Romney?
TheLastWord LaTourette's Sin Drone
RachelMaddow Women's Healthcare
TheEdShow Repeal
Hardball International Raw Money
MorningJoe Mitt Clinton
8-2-12 AM1090 Forum:
Norman Goldman & Don Siegelman
MSNBC "take my word 4 it"
Morning Joe: Chicken Fight**
Rachel Maddow Deadly Republicans ***
Politics Nation
& Hard Ball
* Not exactly (less exactly)
** TheLastWord
*** TheEdShow
[investigation]
8-8-12
Guest Book:
In Memoriam
et al.
Bah zing uh ?
he was the hero of some friends
and I guess nemesis of the opposition.
Segue*: MSNBC Wrong Knee
PoliticsNation Healthcare for Women
MorningJoe- Poll land for Romney?
TheLastWord LaTourette's Sin Drone
RachelMaddow Women's Healthcare
TheEdShow Repeal
Hardball International Raw Money
MorningJoe Mitt Clinton
8-2-12 AM1090 Forum:
Norman Goldman & Don Siegelman
MSNBC "take my word 4 it"
Morning Joe: Chicken Fight**
Rachel Maddow Deadly Republicans ***
Politics Nation
& Hard Ball
* Not exactly (less exactly)
** TheLastWord
*** TheEdShow
[investigation]
8-8-12
Guest Book:
In Memoriam
et al.
Bah zing uh ?
Labels:
AM1090,
Gore Vidal,
memorial,
MSNBCTV,
Norman Goldman,
RIP
Friday, October 21, 2011
Lib...Ya[!] is not Free!
There is enough loopiness in Lib...Ya! and
The Politics of the Table, posts.
but HERE is no October Surprise.
See heading: The Lib...Ya[!] pun is free, but freedom is not only not free, it is not a farce.
"no illusions" quoting the president.
Or Iron Knee?
[Local Tangent?]
[Metrics of Coherence: Martin Bashir]
[Metrics of Comprehensiveness:(Dylan Ratigan) Thumbs Up, Thumbs Down, Thumbs off the scale, Thumbs all around. Not to mock a squad, or cheer lede, but sometimes there is a mess in the message. By this I am pinning a tale on the media, not to mention occu-pied pipers. No Don Qui intended.]
[BTW: these last two bracketeds* are pre-and post vision things**. i.e. the coherence was post Martin Bashir, the comprehensiveness(original comprehension) was pre-emptive of viewing Dylan Ratigan, a transition comment of sorts***, but the perspective was coming from sorted strengths and dynamics, as in areas of politics, economics and foreign policy, not to wholistically thumb up or down individuals or fields.]
* re: Martin and Dylan
** segue
*** for proper chronology I closed the bracket and will insert here the intended Bashir and Ratigan, leaving the rest as is.
[10-22-11: inserting links in asterisk(3) and also insert the two Bashir and one Ratigan within the bracketeds, plus interesting segue- difficult transition]
The Politics of the Table, posts.
but HERE is no October Surprise.
See heading: The Lib...Ya[!] pun is free, but freedom is not only not free, it is not a farce.
"no illusions" quoting the president.
Or Iron Knee?
[Local Tangent?]
[Metrics of Coherence: Martin Bashir]
[Metrics of Comprehensiveness:(Dylan Ratigan) Thumbs Up, Thumbs Down, Thumbs off the scale, Thumbs all around. Not to mock a squad, or cheer lede, but sometimes there is a mess in the message. By this I am pinning a tale on the media, not to mention occu-pied pipers. No Don Qui intended.]
[BTW: these last two bracketeds* are pre-and post vision things**. i.e. the coherence was post Martin Bashir, the comprehensiveness(original comprehension) was pre-emptive of viewing Dylan Ratigan, a transition comment of sorts***, but the perspective was coming from sorted strengths and dynamics, as in areas of politics, economics and foreign policy, not to wholistically thumb up or down individuals or fields.]
* re: Martin and Dylan
** segue
*** for proper chronology I closed the bracket and will insert here the intended Bashir and Ratigan, leaving the rest as is.
[10-22-11: inserting links in asterisk(3) and also insert the two Bashir and one Ratigan within the bracketeds, plus interesting segue- difficult transition]
Monday, September 09, 2013
Saturday, December 17, 2011
The Tetra Heed Run
Of Iron Knee and flip-flop**.
I'd rather pin the tale on the Dawn Key,
than pull the knows off an elephant.
[Oops.]
Con Text : Fields Apart.
Joan asked "why is the the main qualification"
Hitchens: "I don't know."
That is just one loose brick in the difference between polemics and debate, which are not the only foundations of progress. There are limits to logic*, and Hitchens certainly pushes even those of reason.
It seems like the old saw on common sense.
NOT[!] I mean that in a mathematical sense.
* See "saw"
** Footnotes W, X, Y, Z [!]
*** I will let you jig for the Lakoff
[No pun intended on Admiral Perry. See Trip/Lex of Middle]
[All Labels Added 12-20-11]
I'd rather pin the tale on the Dawn Key,
than pull the knows off an elephant.
[Oops.]
Con Text : Fields Apart.
Joan asked "why is the the main qualification"
Hitchens: "I don't know."
That is just one loose brick in the difference between polemics and debate, which are not the only foundations of progress. There are limits to logic*, and Hitchens certainly pushes even those of reason.
It seems like the old saw on common sense.
NOT[!] I mean that in a mathematical sense.
* See "saw"
** Footnotes W, X, Y, Z [!]
*** I will let you jig for the Lakoff
[No pun intended on Admiral Perry. See Trip/Lex of Middle]
[All Labels Added 12-20-11]
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
F'n P[!]
an-archy? / tan gent
[!] sarcasm irony punk.
Lede or Ship: Heading
4 M or links in order of insert
(In F able. / punc. / -archy / gent)
War'n Buffet Rule
The P ?
Original Intent: almost lost, Footnotes Page # ?
Gephardt* -House Republicans Changed the Rules to Keep Government Closed
McConnell -Who Controls the House GOP?
Battle. - George W. Bush and the Real Story of the Great Recession**** - (b.s.) Buffet + Warren
Re - Buffet +Metaphor
: - Rule + Field
congre$$ - [War'n Pic/MoveOn]
AM:
Pelosi/
Klobuchar
Gang **
** links/line anachronistic
AM=Andrea Mithell
*** Deep Files Go 4 it.

(buy Jim'n Knee: Faith 'n Progress ?)
[The Cycle? New Hostage on the Table. / Measured Optimism ? ]
[If you don't vote, you won't get your pudding. How can you get your pudding when you won't eat your meet?]
[!] sarcasm irony punk.
Lede or Ship: Heading
4 M or links in order of insert
(In F able. / punc. / -archy / gent)
War'n Buffet Rule
The P ?
Original Intent: almost lost, Footnotes Page # ?
Gephardt* -House Republicans Changed the Rules to Keep Government Closed
McConnell -Who Controls the House GOP?
Battle. - George W. Bush and the Real Story of the Great Recession**** - (b.s.) Buffet + Warren
Re - Buffet +Metaphor
: - Rule + Field
congre$$ - [War'n Pic/MoveOn]
AM:
Pelosi/
Klobuchar
Gang **
** links/line anachronistic
AM=Andrea Mithell
*** Deep Files Go 4 it.

(buy Jim'n Knee: Faith 'n Progress ?)
[The Cycle? New Hostage on the Table. / Measured Optimism ? ]
[If you don't vote, you won't get your pudding. How can you get your pudding when you won't eat your meet?]
Tuesday, April 02, 2013
Wednesday, June 08, 2011
Re:Verb
Or Sleep* Blogger.
[Original context** to be recaptured later.]***
* "google test"(connecting dots)
** metaphor as language?
*** my original dream(or snooze) muse escaped me(not quite it, or is it? Not!)((nor this)
[Getting warmer?, but I may take a hint in my labels. Speaking of Iron Knee. ]
[Original context** to be recaptured later.]***
* "google test"(connecting dots)
** metaphor as language?
*** my original dream(or snooze) muse escaped me(not quite it, or is it? Not!)((nor this)
[Getting warmer?, but I may take a hint in my labels. Speaking of Iron Knee. ]
Labels:
D'Ribble,
Labels,
MSNBC,
music,
Navigation,
The Ed Show
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)